Wednesday, July 5, 2017




Art as a Culture

(1) Art has and continues to play an important role in defining time periods and the people during those times. An example such as the Lascaux Caves in France is full of various paintings and engravings that are mainly of animals. Most of these consist of horses, cattle, and deer which leads me to believe the culture that created these paintings were probably foragers. A part of their culture would've required a lot of time following a roaming food source and that was important to them. The artists that created these scenes of animals was a way of conveying their lives of traveling the long distances and probably important times of hunting before reaching that area. The amount of detail used for some of these paintings could also tell us about they were observance of the overall anatomy and movement of these animals. Their struggles would've revolved around their survival and becoming knowledgeable of the animals they were hunting and the different climates that they'd have to adapt to in order to continue thriving.
The main difficulty the painters would've encountered in these caves would be lighting. Creating tools to hold and maneuver burning animal fat could've been a way to resolve this and would've then assisted them in moving their way through the caves. The surface of the walls could've also created an issue with the appliance of the materials to paint these animals. It can be seen in images like the Great Red and Black Horse that several techniques were used to create this painting.
Great red and black horse
Many forms of art have been used for storytelling and this could've been a possible function of the cave paintings. Important hunting successes depicting images of those certain animals would've been an example of this. Another possibility would involve a form of religion or belief that creating these paintings would improve their future hunting endeavors. Seeing that there's series of herds of a specific animal in the same area of the cave could indicate that maybe there was more successes during different periods of time. Lastly this could've been a way to record history. There's so many paintings and engravings linking their way deeper into the cave from the passageway. It's possible each group that has explored the cave has recorded their own memories and observations.
(2) Art is also a form of expression and can be interpreted in many ways no matter when and where something has been created. The Lascaux cave paintings express an importance of the animals that were involved in these people's everyday lives and similarly modern artists do the same with subjects that are important personally or throughout the world. It can also be used a way learn. Observing the use of detail in these paintings suggest that they were becoming more knowledge of the behaviors and anatomy that by recreating their own observations could be used to educate themselves. As such examples could also be seen today through illustrations in books or the verses of lyrics in a song.
(3)
Image result for graphic design
Graphic design is visual communication that incorporates images, color, typography and space. We see products of this art form in many ways like billboards, commercials, advertisements, sponsorships, and brands. I don't believe that it's associated with one culture, in a way it's been associated throughout the world. Graphic design is mostly known for its use of images to communicate information and originates to the simplest of forms such as the Lascaux cave paintings. 

1 comment:

  1. Having a little trouble delineating where you address each point. Turn each prompt into paragraphs so your readers (and the person grading your work) can find your points more easily.

    Section 1:
    Part (a): So what were these paintings meant to say? And why? You talk about how they depict their lives, but what were they trying to communicate with these paintings? Are they strictly pictoral? Or do they transmit a message or information of some sort?

    Part (b): Why are their mostly animals and not people? You explain why the animals might be there but not why they have left out people.

    Part (c): What does this tell us about this population? You actually do a good job of explaining this. Do you think men or women painted these?

    Part (d): Difficulties? I agree that lighting would have been the biggest problem, along with access. The wall structure/texture might have been a problem but perhaps they picked sections of wall that worked for them? Not all walls had paintings, correct?

    Part (e): Overall, good. Just recognize that it is making a conceptual leap to assume a religious function. It is possible, but it is also possible that it was just a means of record keeping. Evidence of religious intent is really necessary to make that logical jump.

    Section 2: Good. I like the parallels you drew here.

    Section 3: In general, good discussion on your art form of graphic design. Can you think of any way it can be used for detrimental purposes? How about for propaganda?

    ReplyDelete